[Cod-bugs] 'next' link does not save queried response_items

[Andrius Merkys]

Hi all,

On 2021-11-30 07:28, Saulius Gražulis wrote:
> Its a good question.... I think OPTIMADE spec. does not specify how the
> server should behave regarding the 'response_fields' (but we should
> double check).
> 
> If it is not in the OPTIMADE spec yet, maybe we should include it into
> the spec.?
> 
> I any case, it seems that retaining 'response_fields' (and possibly
> other relevant QS parameters) is a good think and should be easy to do.
> I forward Andrius, maybe he can have a closer look at the implementation
> and enhance it.

Matthew has opened an issue in the OPTIMADE specification repository
[1]. I suggest continuing the discussion there in order to make possible
the involvement of all OPTIMADE specification developers.

[1] https://github.com/Materials-Consortia/OPTIMADE/issues/391

Best,
Andrius

-- 
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.