[Cod-bugs] problematic entry COD1011045

[Norwid Behrnd]

Dear maintainer of the COD,

not knowing if one of you is subscriber to the user mailing list of Jmol, I
would like to relay the information that by yesterday arvo, Reinhard Neder
reported some difficulties processing data related to entry COD1011045.

Apparently, the .cif as currently ([2022-09-15 Thu]) available by direct
access from your web site follows a syntax different to the one Jmol writes
when accessing the structure by 

```Jmol console
load =cod/1011045
```

My question to you is this:  Though the .cif obtained directly from the COD
does use unique labels, would this entry worth a revision / provision of a
second .cif in more modern format because contemporary .cif state the atom type
with a neutral, uncharged element symbol?

There has been some exchange about this, and the public thread starts by his
message by [2022-09-14 Thu 14:04] (Paris time normal)

https://sourceforge.net/p/jmol/mailman/message/37707263/

Simply because I'm not aware if one of you, I enclose the archive
2022-09-15_support_for_cod.zip; it contains data files attached during this
exchange (.cif and .png format submitted, and a readme.org).

With best regards,

Norwid Behrnd


---- 8>< ---- md5sum ---- file(s) attached ----
7e6909cdf1a7eff767e973ca853e91ce  2022-09-15_support_for_cod.zip
---- 8>< ----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2022-09-15_support_for_cod.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 243030 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.crystallography.net/pipermail/cod-bugs/attachments/20220915/f8d075b7/attachment-0001.zip>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.crystallography.net/pipermail/cod-bugs/attachments/20220915/f8d075b7/attachment-0001.sig>