[TCOD] [SPAM] Re: What structures do we accept to TCOD?
Stefaan Cottenier
Stefaan.Cottenier at UGent.be
Tue Jul 29 14:06:45 UTC 2014
Dear Armel,
> However, I have almost never seen the comparison of the experimental
> data to the intensities calculated from the optimized atomic
> coordinates... I have especially in mind a "simple" example, calcium
> carbonate, vaterite form, for which dozens of optimized models were
> proposed, without even one comparison to the data...
I don't think this is really rare. But often there is simply no need to
do it. One case in which I was somewhat involved makes such an explicit
comparison in figs. 3-4-5: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.054110
. Another example that comes to my mind is a structure prediction
problem by Oganov (fig. 2 in
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.10.014). And I remember a
conference presentation by Chris Wolverton where he does DFT structure
prediction not by optimizing total energy but by minimizing the
difference between the experimental and DFT-based powder spectrum.
> So the question is : In case of the existence of an experimental
> dataset, should a comparison observed/calculated be requested
> (classical R values but with fixed coordinates) ?
According to me: no. Let me slightly idealize, and assume that for every
entry in TCOD the numerics are done right. In that case, all entries
would contain the exact/unique/precise prediction for a particular
crystal *at the given level of theory*. Everyone working at the same
level of theory (e.g. using the same XC-functional within DFT) would
make essentially the same prediction. That may or may not agree with the
experimental structure, either because the experiment is 'wrong' (e.g. a
small contamination that triggers a different crystal structure than for
the pure material that has been calculated) or because the level of
theory is insufficient (there is no XC-functional known that is 100%
correct for all classes of materials).
My point is: the task of comparing experiment and theory (i.e. comparing
COD and TCOD) is a research task in its own right. It should be
performed by the users of these databases. For TCOD as a computational
database, comparison to the alien world of experiments is not the thing
to do. It would be similar to allowing into COD only those structures
that have survived a DFT check ;-)
Best,
Stefaan
More information about the Tcod
mailing list