looks nice, good job !
just: 'theoretical', not 'theoretica', first slide ...
Le 26/01/2016 13:00, tcod-request@lists.crystallography.net a écrit :
Send Tcod mailing list submissions to tcod@lists.crystallography.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.crystallography.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tcod or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to tcod-request@lists.crystallography.net
You can reach the person managing the list at tcod-owner@lists.crystallography.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Tcod digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CECAM workshop "Towards a Common Format for Computational Materials Science Data" (Saulius Gra?ulis) 2. Re: CECAM workshop "Towards a Common Format for Computational Materials Science Data" (Stefaan Cottenier)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:41:56 +0200 From: Saulius Gra?ulis grazulis@ibt.lt To: tcod@lists.crystallography.net Subject: [TCOD] CECAM workshop "Towards a Common Format for Computational Materials Science Data" Message-ID: 56A72344.1090804@ibt.lt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Dear colleagues,
I am currently at the CECAM workshop "Towards a Common Format for Computational Materials Science Data", which has direct and very important relevance to the TCOD and our dictionaries. This afternoon, I'll give a talk on the TCOD, other crystallographic databases and their potential for crystallography:
http://www.crystallography.net/archives/2016/slides/2016-Lausanne-CECAM/slid...
Yesterday people presented Nomad and MGI databases, a very impressive development since the last CECAM meeting.
My main goal would be to make sure that TCOD dictionaries, Nomad and MGI ontologies are all compatible so that we can seamlessly exchange data between experimental and theoretical applications.
All you ideas and comments are very welcome! (and my apologies if I inadvertently forgot someone in the acknowledgements -- please remind me ;) )
Sincerely yours, Saulius