Dear colleagues,
I am currently at the CECAM workshop "Towards a Common Format for Computational Materials Science Data", which has direct and very important relevance to the TCOD and our dictionaries. This afternoon, I'll give a talk on the TCOD, other crystallographic databases and their potential for crystallography:
http://www.crystallography.net/archives/2016/slides/2016-Lausanne-CECAM/slid...
Yesterday people presented Nomad and MGI databases, a very impressive development since the last CECAM meeting.
My main goal would be to make sure that TCOD dictionaries, Nomad and MGI ontologies are all compatible so that we can seamlessly exchange data between experimental and theoretical applications.
All you ideas and comments are very welcome! (and my apologies if I inadvertently forgot someone in the acknowledgements -- please remind me ;) )
Sincerely yours, Saulius